[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALxhOnjrjF1XuwGd_F5xFz97noTvebhzdCvN51v93zOTuQqDiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:45:54 +0530
From: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] ia64: uapi header and system call table file generation
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 17:40, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:16 PM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > +#include <asm/syscall_table.h>
> > .org sys_call_table + 8*NR_syscalls // guard against failures to increase NR_syscalls
> > +#undef __SYSCALL
>
> This part looks odd: according to the comment, this should only guard against
> the table getting out of sync. However, with the script, that will never happen.
Thanks for pointing it out this error.
- Firoz
>
> Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists