[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181001153101.GA23286@ziepe.ca>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 09:31:01 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, john.hubbard@...il.com,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Benvenuti <benve@...co.com>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] get_user_pages*() and RDMA: first steps
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 04:11:27PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> This reminds me so much of Linux mmap() in the mid-2000s - mmap()
> worked for ext3 without being aware of page faults, so most mm/
> developers at the time were of the opinion that all the other
> filesystems should work just fine without being aware of page
> faults.
This is probably because RDMA was introduced around that time, before
page_mkwrite was added.. It kind of sounds like page_mkwrite() broke
all the writing get_user_pages users and it wasn't realized at the
time.
BTW, we are hosting a session on this at Plumbers during the RDMA
track, hope everyone interested will be able to attend.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists