linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: sama5d4: write the mode register in two steps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181001155217.GE2967@piout.net>
Date:   Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:52:17 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To:     Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com>
Cc:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: sama5d4: write the mode register in two
 steps

On 17/09/2018 15:58:45+0200, Romain Izard wrote:
> 2018-09-14 12:27 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>:
> > On 14/09/2018 12:13:39+0200, Romain Izard wrote:
> >> The specification for SAMA5D2 and SAMA5D4 chips, that use this IP for
> >> their watchdog timer, has the following advice regarding the Mode Register:
> >>
> >> "When setting the WDDIS bit, and while it is set, the fields WDV and WDD
> >> must not be modified."
> >>
> >> I have observed on a board based on a SAMA5D2 chip that using any other
> >> timeout duration than the default 16s in the device tree will reset the
> >> board when the watchdog device is opened; this is probably due to ignoring
> >> the aforementioned constraint.
> >>
> >> To fix this, read the content of the Mode Register before writing it,
> >> and split the access into two parts if WDV or WDD need to be changed.
> >>
> >
> > Hum, that is really weird because when I developed
> > 015b528644a84b0018d3286ecd6ea5f82dce0180, I tested with a program doing:
> >
> >         flags = WDIOS_DISABLECARD;
> >         ioctl(fd, WDIOC_SETOPTIONS, &flags);
> >         for (i = 16; i > 2; i--) {
> >                 ioctl(fd, WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT, &i);
> >         }
> >
> >         ioctl(fd, WDIOC_KEEPALIVE, &dummy);
> >
> >         flags = WDIOS_ENABLECARD;
> >         ioctl(fd, WDIOC_SETOPTIONS, &flags);
> >
> >         for (i = 16; i > 2; i--) {
> >                 ioctl(fd, WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT, &i);
> >         }
> >
> > This would immediately reproduce the reset when changing WDV/WDD with
> > WDDIS set.
> >
> > I'll test again.
> >
> 
> The issue is visible when setting a custom value for the timeout on startup.
> In the past it was only possible to do so with a module parameter, and the
> previous patch in the series makes it possible to do with the device tree.
> 
> When using the Linux4SAM 5.7 release, it is sufficient to set the timeout on
> the command line to reproduce the issue:
> 
> In the bootloader:
> # setenv bootargs $bootargs sama5d4_wdt.wdt_timeout=10
> 
> To trigger an immediate reset (with some code that should work):
> # (echo 1; while sleep 3; do echo 1; done) > /dev/watchdog
> 

Ok, I've tested and seen the issue. I agree with Guenter that it is
probably worth having a function to update MR that takes the timeout
value and whether the watchdog needs to be enabled. It would probably
make caching mr unnecessary.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com