linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH security-next v3 01/29] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9c0f5719-1028-bb8b-972e-dd38f4358f84@canonical.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:05:32 -0700
From:   John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:     Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        "Schaufler, Casey" <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH security-next v3 01/29] LSM: Correctly announce start of
 LSM initialization

On 09/24/2018 05:18 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> For a while now, the LSM core has said it was "initializED", rather than
> "initializING". This adjust the report to be more accurate (i.e. before
> this was reported before any LSMs had been initialized.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>

Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>

> ---
>  security/security.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 736e78da1ab9..4cbcf244a965 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -72,10 +72,11 @@ int __init security_init(void)
>  	int i;
>  	struct hlist_head *list = (struct hlist_head *) &security_hook_heads;
>  
> +	pr_info("Security Framework initializing\n");
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(security_hook_heads) / sizeof(struct hlist_head);
>  	     i++)
>  		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&list[i]);
> -	pr_info("Security Framework initialized\n");
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Load minor LSMs, with the capability module always first.
>