linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: Fix for movable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181002140111.GW18290@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 16:01:11 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: Fix for movable_node boot option

On Thu 27-09-18 22:41:36, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
> 
> > This patch series are the fix for movable_node boot option
> > issue which was introduced by commit 124049decbb1 ("x86/e820:
> > put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved").
> > 
> > First patch, revert the commit. Second and third patch fix the
> > original issue.
> 
> Can the mm folks please comment on this?

I was under impression that Pavel who authored the original change which
got reverted here has reviewed these patches.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs