linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the qcom tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181002133144.4ea80f23@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:31:44 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the qcom tree

Hi Rob,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/soc/qcom/apr.c

between commit:

  4fadb26574cb ("soc: qcom: apr: Avoid string overflow")

from the qcom tree and commit:

  b2efb5b04591 ("soc: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/soc/qcom/apr.c
index 716762d59c1f,4bda793ba6ae..000000000000
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/apr.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/apr.c
@@@ -219,9 -219,9 +219,9 @@@ static int apr_add_device(struct devic
  	adev->domain_id = id->domain_id;
  	adev->version = id->svc_version;
  	if (np)
- 		strscpy(adev->name, np->name, APR_NAME_SIZE);
+ 		snprintf(adev->name, APR_NAME_SIZE, "%pOFn", np);
  	else
 -		strncpy(adev->name, id->name, APR_NAME_SIZE);
 +		strscpy(adev->name, id->name, APR_NAME_SIZE);
  
  	dev_set_name(&adev->dev, "aprsvc:%s:%x:%x", adev->name,
  		     id->domain_id, id->svc_id);

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped