[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181002145647.GG19792@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 20:26:47 +0530
From: Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@...il.com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
appana.durga.rao@...inx.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: program hardware supported
buffer length
On 28-09-18, 08:53, Andrea Merello wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 6:25 PM Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > @@ -964,7 +968,7 @@ static int xilinx_dma_calc_copysize(struct xilinx_dma_chan *chan,
> > > int size, int done)
> > > {
> > > size_t copy = min_t(size_t, size - done,
> > > - XILINX_DMA_MAX_TRANS_LEN);
> > > + chan->xdev->max_buffer_len);
> >
> > hmm why not add max_buffer_len in patch 1 again, and then use default
> > len as XILINX_DMA_MAX_TRANS_LEN and add multiple lengths here :)
>
> Sorry, I'm not getting your point. Could you please elaborate the "add
> multiple lengths here" thing ?
IIRC (sorry been travelling and vacation), add
chan->xdev->max_buffer_len in patch 1 and initialize it to
XILINX_DMA_MAX_TRANS_LEN. Then in subsequent patches update the length.
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists