linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] SoundWire updates for 4.20-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181002184400.GA28146@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 11:44:00 -0700
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     vkoul@...nel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SoundWire updates for 4.20-rc1

On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 08:38:41PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 8:20 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 07:53:27PM +0530, Vinod wrote:
> > > Hey Greg,
> > >
> > > Here are the SoundWire updates (again) for 4.20-rc1/5.0-rc1
> > > This brings in the multi-link streaming support and rst format
> > > corrections. The changes are in linux-next for quite some time.
> > >
> > > Please consider pull to receive:
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit 8d6ccf5cebbc7ed1dee9986e36853a78dfb64084:
> > >
> > >   soundwire: Fix acquiring bus lock twice during master release (2018-08-27 09:49:48 +0530)
> > >
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >
> > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/soundwire.git tags/soundwire-4.20-rc1
> >
> > Now pulled, thanks.
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Confused here -- pulled to where? 4.19 will still have rc7, no?

Pulled to my char-misc-branch to be submitted to "mainline" once
4.19-final is out.

This has nothing to do with the 4.19-rc development process right now,
sorry for any potential confusion.

thanks,

greg k-h