linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v5 12/21] tpm: move pcr extend code to tpm2-cmd.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9D9DFAA5@hasmsx109.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 04:58:25 +0000
From:   "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
        "Struk, Tadeusz" <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>,
        "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "roberto.sassu@...wei.com" <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 12/21] tpm: move pcr extend code to tpm2-cmd.c



> 
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 01:30:26AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > Add tpm2_pcr_extend() function to tpm2-cmd.c with signature required
> > by tpm-interface.c. It wraps the original open code implementation.
> > The original original tpm2_pcr_extend() function is renamed to
> > __tpm2_pcr_extend() and made static, it is called only from new
> > tpm2_pcr_extend().
> >
> > Fix warnings in __tpm2_pcr_extend()
> > tpm2-cmd.c:251:16: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
> > integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
> > tpm2-cmd.c:252:17: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
> > integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> 
> We do not want the signature change, especially because as we are working
> on getting Roberto's changes in and also because it has absolutely a zero
> gain. Who cares if those functions take different parameters? I don't.

Yes, we do care this series tries to have a clean cut between 1.x  and 2.x specs. Please, let's finish one transformation and then move to another.
I understand that Roberto will have to rebase anyhow, if this series goes in first, if this is hard I can do it myself, it's trivial.

Tomas