[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181002205259.GA16090@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:52:59 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...sac.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] yama: clarify ptrace_scope=2 in Yama documentation
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:47:23PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Current phrasing is ambiguous since it's unclear if attaching to a
> children through PTRACE_TRACEME requires CAP_SYS_PTRACE. Rephrase the
> sentence to make that clear.
I disagree that your sentence makes that clear. How about:
> 2 - admin-only attach:
> - only processes with ``CAP_SYS_PTRACE`` may use ptrace
> - with ``PTRACE_ATTACH``, or through children calling ``PTRACE_TRACEME``.
> + only processes with ``CAP_SYS_PTRACE`` may use ptrace, either with
> + ``PTRACE_ATTACH`` or through children calling ``PTRACE_TRACEME``.
+ only processes with ``CAP_SYS_PTRACE`` may use ptrace. This
+ restricts both ``PTRACE_ATTACH`` and ``PTRACE_TRACEME``.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists