linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] yama: clarify ptrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:52:59 -0700
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...sac.net>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] yama: clarify ptrace_scope=2 in Yama documentation

On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:47:23PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Current phrasing is ambiguous since it's unclear if attaching to a
> children through PTRACE_TRACEME requires CAP_SYS_PTRACE. Rephrase the
> sentence to make that clear.

I disagree that your sentence makes that clear.  How about:

>  2 - admin-only attach:
> -    only processes with ``CAP_SYS_PTRACE`` may use ptrace
> -    with ``PTRACE_ATTACH``, or through children calling ``PTRACE_TRACEME``.
> +    only processes with ``CAP_SYS_PTRACE`` may use ptrace, either with
> +    ``PTRACE_ATTACH`` or through children calling ``PTRACE_TRACEME``.

+    only processes with ``CAP_SYS_PTRACE`` may use ptrace.  This
+    restricts both ``PTRACE_ATTACH`` and ``PTRACE_TRACEME``.