linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nvmem: hide unused nvmem_find_cell_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mc4UF-Okbk2zqgnJ+1D-RZvavkSru3-fOGGbJB=ejXxSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 23:23:57 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: hide unused nvmem_find_cell_by_index function

wt., 2 paź 2018 o 23:11 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> napisał(a):
>
> nvmem_find_cell_by_index() is only called from inside an #ifdef,
> so we get a build warning without CONFIG_OF:
>
> drivers/nvmem/core.c:496:1: error: 'nvmem_find_cell_by_index' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>
> Move it into the same #ifdef as the caller to avoid the warning.
>
> Fixes: e888d445ac33 ("nvmem: resolve cells from DT at registration time")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
>  drivers/nvmem/core.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index cc815bb2eebd..f99fb74a646e 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -492,22 +492,6 @@ static int nvmem_add_cells_from_table(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
>         return rval;
>  }
>
> -static struct nvmem_cell *
> -nvmem_find_cell_by_index(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, int index)
> -{
> -       struct nvmem_cell *cell = NULL;
> -       int i = 0;
> -
> -       mutex_lock(&nvmem_mutex);
> -       list_for_each_entry(cell, &nvmem->cells, node) {
> -               if (index == i++)
> -                       break;
> -       }
> -       mutex_unlock(&nvmem_mutex);
> -
> -       return cell;
> -}
> -
>  static struct nvmem_cell *
>  nvmem_find_cell_by_name(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, const char *cell_id)
>  {
> @@ -972,6 +956,22 @@ nvmem_cell_get_from_lookup(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
>  }
>
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> +static struct nvmem_cell *
> +nvmem_find_cell_by_index(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, int index)
> +{
> +       struct nvmem_cell *cell = NULL;
> +       int i = 0;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&nvmem_mutex);
> +       list_for_each_entry(cell, &nvmem->cells, node) {
> +               if (index == i++)
> +                       break;
> +       }
> +       mutex_unlock(&nvmem_mutex);
> +
> +       return cell;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * of_nvmem_cell_get() - Get a nvmem cell from given device node and cell id
>   *
> --
> 2.18.0
>

Srinivas,

I think this is even better than __maybe_unused so if you're fine I
won't resend my patch tomorrow.

Thanks,
Bart