linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the xarray tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181002172721.03cdde07@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 17:27:21 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the xarray
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  include/linux/radix-tree.h

between commit:

  be18dc56ed20 ("xarray: Define struct xa_node")

from the xarray tree and commit:

  e4618700a039 ("include/linux/radix-tree.h: use DIV_ROUND_UP instead of reimplementing its function")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (I just used ther former version) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped