[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181002083100.GB4263@pathfinder>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:31:00 +0100
From: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: dushistov@...l.ru, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: ufs: Convert ufs_set_de_type to use lookup table
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 03:28:14AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 04:33:10PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > Modify ufs_set_de_type function in fs/ufs/util.h to use a lookup
> > table rather than a switch statement, as per the TODO comment.
>
> Brittle, that... Something like fs/ext2/dir.c approach (that is,
> #define S_SHIFT 12
> static unsigned char ext2_type_by_mode[S_IFMT >> S_SHIFT] = {
> [S_IFREG >> S_SHIFT] = EXT2_FT_REG_FILE,
> [S_IFDIR >> S_SHIFT] = EXT2_FT_DIR,
> [S_IFCHR >> S_SHIFT] = EXT2_FT_CHRDEV,
> [S_IFBLK >> S_SHIFT] = EXT2_FT_BLKDEV,
> [S_IFIFO >> S_SHIFT] = EXT2_FT_FIFO,
> [S_IFSOCK >> S_SHIFT] = EXT2_FT_SOCK,
> [S_IFLNK >> S_SHIFT] = EXT2_FT_SYMLINK,
> };
> in there) would be saner, IMO. Note that DT_UNKNOWN is zero, so the
> array elements lacking an explicit initializer will end up with that.
>
> What's more, the values are ->i_mode >> 12 or 0, depending upon the
> value being valid. And since the upper layers do validate the type,
> I'd consider simply using (inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) >> 12 there.
> Unlike ext2, ufs stores straight bits 12..15 there (ext2 uses an
> enum with sequential values instead; e.g. regular files are encoded
> as 1 there, not 8 as on ufs)...
Dear Al,
Thank you for taking time to offer your feedback, I really appreciate
it. I will rework this patch this evening and resubmit.
Regards,
Phil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists