linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] doc:it_IT: add some process/* translations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 02 Oct 2018 10:43:10 +0200
From:   Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alessia Mantegazza <amantegazza@...a.pv.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc:it_IT: add some process/* translations

Hi Jon,

I was on a long holiday. I will re-send a V2 patch without that document in 
the next days

On Thursday, September 20, 2018 10:35:11 PM CEST Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:29:57 -0600
> 
> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> > On Sun,  9 Sep 2018 18:16:41 +0200
> > 
> > Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it> wrote:
> > > This patch does not translate entirely the subfolder "process/"
> > > but only part of it (to begin with).
> > > 
> > > In order to avoid broken links, I included empty documents
> > > for those which are not yet translated.
> > > 
> > > In order to be able to refer to all documents in "process/",
> > > I added a sphinx label to those which had not one.
> > > 
> > > Translated documents:
> > > - howto
> > > - 1.Intro
> > > - clang-format
> > > - coding-style
> > > - kernel-driver-statement
> > > - magic-number
> > > - volatile-considered-harmful
> > > - development-process
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it>
> > > Signed-off-by: Alessia Mantegazza <amantegazza@...a.pv.it>
> > 
> > Applied, thanks.
> 
> Actually, I just backed that out, sorry.  There's an immediate conflict
> with -next over code-of-conflict.rst that is best avoided, and there is
> no point in adding a translation of the old code. If you can respin the
> patch set without that change, I'll apply it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon


-- 
Federico Vaga
http://www.federicovaga.it/