lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 17:16:27 +0800
From:   Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        H Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Stuart R . Anderson" <stuart.r.anderson@...el.com>,
        alan@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/earlyprintk: Add a force option for pciserial
 device

Hi Boris,

On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:30:04PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:18:10PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> > As I rechecked, the baud rate for pciserial is optional, so there may
> > be no ",baudrate" following the "force". So this 2 strncmp is to
> > cover conditions for with and without baudrate.
> 
> And what guarantees you have a space after the "force"?
> 
> 	!strncmp(s, "force ", 6)
> 			  ^

You are right, it can't be guranteed. Can we still use strncmp(s, "force", 5)
and rely on developer to set it right? any suggestions? thanks,

- Feng

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ