[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9HWPrsaQnFzNi-Kt7kq8yXwFsP5W-4dZrD6eozKbT9zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 11:26:42 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@...onical.com>,
Alistair Strachan <astrachan@...gle.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Ivan Hu <ivan.hu@...onical.com>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...hat.com>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/11] EFI updates for v4.20
On 2 October 2018 at 10:38, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> * Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > On 27/09/18 09:50, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> > > Thomas, Ingo,
>> > >
>> > > Please pull/cherry-pick the below. Note that the first three patches will
>> > > be depended upon by an irqchip series that Marc Zyngier has sent out last
>> > > week, and that targets the next release as well. So please advise how to
>> > > proceed with that: we could simply apply those patches first and use the
>> > > resulting commit in tip.git as a stable branch, I suppose, but I'll let
>> > > Marc chime in in case he has any other ideas.
>> >
>> > A stable branch with these three patches would be great. The irqchip code
>> > will also end-up in tip, so it should all be quite easy to manage anyway.
>>
>> Yeah - nevertheless, to keep it all separated nicely, I've created a new
>> topic tree for this: tip:efi/irqchip (2e3ac98133a3), with just these three
>> patches on top of latest -git.
>>
>> That way it can then all be iterated separately.
>>
>> Does this approach work for you?
>
> It's a23d3bb05ccb - i.e. the commit ID of Ard's tree, so if you already based your work on top
> of that then you won't even need to rebase anything.
>
Thanks Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists