linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 02/10] Makefile: Prepare for using macros for inline asm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181002105952.GA13611@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 12:59:52 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/10] Makefile: Prepare for using macros for inline
 asm


* Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com> wrote:

> at 1:58 AM, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> 
> > On 2018-09-18 23:28, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > 
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
> >> index 8f6e7eb8ae9f..944fa3bc9376 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/Makefile
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
> >> @@ -214,8 +214,8 @@ ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> >> KBUILD_LDFLAGS += $(call ld-option, -z max-page-size=0x200000)
> >> endif
> >> 
> >> -# Speed up the build
> >> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -pipe
> >> +# We cannot use -pipe flag since we give an additional .s file to the compiler
> >> +#KBUILD_CFLAGS += -pipe
> > 
> > Is this really necessary? The gas manual says that one can use -- to
> > name stdin, though that's probably a typo and should just be - . Doing
> > 
> > gcc -pipe -Wa,foo.s -Wa,-
> 
> Good idea. I didn’t think of it. Yes, this can do the trick. I’ll do it in
> v9.

Ok, will wait for v9.

Thanks,

	Ingo