linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mscc: allow extracting the FCS into the skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181002124323.GC9155@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:43:23 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        quentin.schulz@...tlin.com, allan.nielsen@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mscc: allow extracting the FCS into the skb

> The question could be "do we need len += ETH_FCS_LEN" to account for the
> FCS when NETIF_F_RXFCS is used", but I looked at other drivers and it
> seemed to me the FCS is not accounted in the stats. Should it be?

Hi Antoine

There does not appear to be a good answer to that. I submitted a patch
to a driver i'm using to not count it, so that the stats counters we
consistent with another driver. The patch was rejected.

I think the best you can do is flip a coin, and then document it using
a comment about if it is/is not included.

  Andrew