[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181002132500.774246821@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 06:22:02 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 025/228] drm/amd/display/dc/dce: Fix multiple potential integer overflows
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
[ Upstream commit 6f3472a993e7cb63cde5d818dcabc8e42fc03744 ]
Add suffix ULL to constant 5 and cast variables target_pix_clk_khz and
feedback_divider to uint64_t in order to avoid multiple potential integer
overflows and give the compiler complete information about the proper
arithmetic to use.
Notice that such constant and variables are used in contexts that
expect expressions of type uint64_t (64 bits, unsigned). The current
casts to uint64_t effectively apply to each expression as a whole,
but they do not prevent them from being evaluated using 32-bit
arithmetic instead of 64-bit arithmetic.
Also, once the expressions are properly evaluated using 64-bit
arithmentic, there is no need for the parentheses that enclose
them.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1460245 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1460286 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1460401 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: 4562236b3bc0 ("drm/amd/dc: Add dc display driver (v2)")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static bool calculate_fb_and_fractional_
uint64_t feedback_divider;
feedback_divider =
- (uint64_t)(target_pix_clk_khz * ref_divider * post_divider);
+ (uint64_t)target_pix_clk_khz * ref_divider * post_divider;
feedback_divider *= 10;
/* additional factor, since we divide by 10 afterwards */
feedback_divider *= (uint64_t)(calc_pll_cs->fract_fb_divider_factor);
@@ -145,8 +145,8 @@ static bool calculate_fb_and_fractional_
* of fractional feedback decimal point and the fractional FB Divider precision
* is 2 then the equation becomes (ullfeedbackDivider + 5*100) / (10*100))*/
- feedback_divider += (uint64_t)
- (5 * calc_pll_cs->fract_fb_divider_precision_factor);
+ feedback_divider += 5ULL *
+ calc_pll_cs->fract_fb_divider_precision_factor;
feedback_divider =
div_u64(feedback_divider,
calc_pll_cs->fract_fb_divider_precision_factor * 10);
@@ -203,8 +203,8 @@ static bool calc_fb_divider_checking_tol
&fract_feedback_divider);
/*Actual calculated value*/
- actual_calc_clk_khz = (uint64_t)(feedback_divider *
- calc_pll_cs->fract_fb_divider_factor) +
+ actual_calc_clk_khz = (uint64_t)feedback_divider *
+ calc_pll_cs->fract_fb_divider_factor +
fract_feedback_divider;
actual_calc_clk_khz *= calc_pll_cs->ref_freq_khz;
actual_calc_clk_khz =
Powered by blists - more mailing lists