[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181002132504.232798365@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 06:22:50 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 073/228] media: ov772x: allow i2c controllers without I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 0b964d183cbf3f95a062ad9f3eec87ffa2790558 ]
The ov772x driver only works when the i2c controller have
I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING. However, many i2c controller drivers don't
support it.
The reason that the ov772x requires I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING is that
it doesn't support repeated starts.
This changes the reading ov772x register method so that it doesn't
require I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING by calling two separated i2c messages.
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c
@@ -542,9 +542,19 @@ static struct ov772x_priv *to_ov772x(str
return container_of(sd, struct ov772x_priv, subdev);
}
-static inline int ov772x_read(struct i2c_client *client, u8 addr)
+static int ov772x_read(struct i2c_client *client, u8 addr)
{
- return i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, addr);
+ int ret;
+ u8 val;
+
+ ret = i2c_master_send(client, &addr, 1);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ ret = i2c_master_recv(client, &val, 1);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ return val;
}
static inline int ov772x_write(struct i2c_client *client, u8 addr, u8 value)
@@ -1263,13 +1273,11 @@ static int ov772x_probe(struct i2c_clien
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA |
- I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING)) {
+ if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA)) {
dev_err(&adapter->dev,
- "I2C-Adapter doesn't support SMBUS_BYTE_DATA or PROTOCOL_MANGLING\n");
+ "I2C-Adapter doesn't support SMBUS_BYTE_DATA\n");
return -EIO;
}
- client->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_SCCB;
priv = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!priv)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists