linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.18 123/228] fs/lock: skip lock owner pid translation in case we are in init_pid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue,  2 Oct 2018 06:23:40 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...tuozzo.com>,
        Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
        Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 123/228] fs/lock: skip lock owner pid translation in case we are in init_pid_ns

4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...tuozzo.com>

[ Upstream commit 826d7bc9f013d01e92997883d2fd0c25f4af1f1c ]

If the flock owner process is dead and its pid has been already freed,
pid translation won't work, but we still want to show flock owner pid
number when expecting /proc/$PID/fdinfo/$FD in init pidns.

Reproducer:
process A	process A1	process A2
fork()--------->
exit()		open()
		flock()
		fork()--------->
		exit()		sleep()

Before the patch:
================
(root@vz7)/: cat /proc/${PID_A2}/fdinfo/3
pos:    4
flags:  02100002
mnt_id: 257
lock:   (root@vz7)/:

After the patch:
===============
(root@vz7)/:cat /proc/${PID_A2}/fdinfo/3
pos:    4
flags:  02100002
mnt_id: 295
lock:   1: FLOCK  ADVISORY  WRITE ${PID_A1} b6:f8a61:529946 0 EOF

Fixes: 9d5b86ac13c5 ("fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks")
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...tuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/locks.c |    7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -2072,6 +2072,13 @@ static pid_t locks_translate_pid(struct
 		return -1;
 	if (IS_REMOTELCK(fl))
 		return fl->fl_pid;
+	/*
+	 * If the flock owner process is dead and its pid has been already
+	 * freed, the translation below won't work, but we still want to show
+	 * flock owner pid number in init pidns.
+	 */
+	if (ns == &init_pid_ns)
+		return (pid_t)fl->fl_pid;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	pid = find_pid_ns(fl->fl_pid, &init_pid_ns);