linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 041/137] alarmtimer: Prevent overflow for relative nanosleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181002132501.342762356@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  2 Oct 2018 06:24:02 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Team OWL337 <icytxw@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 041/137] alarmtimer: Prevent overflow for relative nanosleep

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

[ Upstream commit 5f936e19cc0ef97dbe3a56e9498922ad5ba1edef ]

Air Icy reported:

  UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in kernel/time/alarmtimer.c:811:7
  signed integer overflow:
  1529859276030040771 + 9223372036854775807 cannot be represented in type 'long long int'
  Call Trace:
   alarm_timer_nsleep+0x44c/0x510 kernel/time/alarmtimer.c:811
   __do_sys_clock_nanosleep kernel/time/posix-timers.c:1235 [inline]
   __se_sys_clock_nanosleep kernel/time/posix-timers.c:1213 [inline]
   __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep+0x326/0x4e0 kernel/time/posix-timers.c:1213
   do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x3a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290

alarm_timer_nsleep() uses ktime_add() to add the current time and the
relative expiry value. ktime_add() has no sanity checks so the addition
can overflow when the relative timeout is large enough.

Use ktime_add_safe() which has the necessary sanity checks in place and
limits the result to the valid range.

Fixes: 9a7adcf5c6de ("timers: Posix interface for alarm-timers")
Reported-by: Team OWL337 <icytxw@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1807020926360.1595@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/time/alarmtimer.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
@@ -808,7 +808,8 @@ static int alarm_timer_nsleep(const cloc
 	/* Convert (if necessary) to absolute time */
 	if (flags != TIMER_ABSTIME) {
 		ktime_t now = alarm_bases[type].gettime();
-		exp = ktime_add(now, exp);
+
+		exp = ktime_add_safe(now, exp);
 	}
 
 	ret = alarmtimer_do_nsleep(&alarm, exp, type);