linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] libosd: Remove ignored _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Oct 2018 18:16:32 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Boaz Harrosh <ooo@...ctrozaur.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libosd: Remove ignored __weak attribute

On 9/30/18 1:54 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> diff --git a/include/scsi/osd_types.h b/include/scsi/osd_types.h
> index 48e8a165e136..6b6fdcafa6cc 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/osd_types.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/osd_types.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct osd_obj_id {
>   	osd_id id;
>   };
>   
> -static const struct __weak osd_obj_id osd_root_object = {0, 0};
> +static const struct osd_obj_id osd_root_object = {0, 0};

Structure definitions should occur in .c files instead of in header 
files especially if the header file is included from multiple source 
files. Please consider moving the definition of osd_root_object into a 
.c file. Additionally, zero initializers should be left out to minimize 
the size of object files.

Boaz, the most recent osd patch that is neither trivial nor treewide 
refactoring is six years old (51976a8c85ce ("[SCSI] osd_uld: Add osdname 
& systemid sysfs at scsi_osd class"). That suggests that nobody is using 
this driver anymore. Can this driver be removed from the kernel tree?

Thanks,

Bart.