linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 21/94] x86/entry/64: Add two more instruction suffixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181002132501.959841438@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  2 Oct 2018 06:24:35 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 21/94] x86/entry/64: Add two more instruction suffixes

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>

[ Upstream commit 6709812f094d96543b443645c68daaa32d3d3e77 ]

Sadly, other than claimed in:

  a368d7fd2a ("x86/entry/64: Add instruction suffix")

... there are two more instances which want to be adjusted.

As said there, omitting suffixes from instructions in AT&T mode is bad
practice when operand size cannot be determined by the assembler from
register operands, and is likely going to be warned about by upstream
gas in the future (mine does already).

Add the other missing suffixes here as well.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5B3A02DD02000078001CFB78@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ ENDPROC(native_usergs_sysret64)
 .endm
 
 .macro TRACE_IRQS_IRETQ_DEBUG
-	bt	$9, EFLAGS(%rsp)		/* interrupts off? */
+	btl	$9, EFLAGS(%rsp)		/* interrupts off? */
 	jnc	1f
 	TRACE_IRQS_ON_DEBUG
 1:
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ retint_kernel:
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
 	/* Interrupts are off */
 	/* Check if we need preemption */
-	bt	$9, EFLAGS(%rsp)		/* were interrupts off? */
+	btl	$9, EFLAGS(%rsp)		/* were interrupts off? */
 	jnc	1f
 0:	cmpl	$0, PER_CPU_VAR(__preempt_count)
 	jnz	1f