linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 52/94] nfsd: fix corrupted reply to badly ordered compound

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181002132504.113002475@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  2 Oct 2018 06:25:06 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 52/94] nfsd: fix corrupted reply to badly ordered compound

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 5b7b15aee641904ae269be9846610a3950cbd64c ]

We're encoding a single op in the reply but leaving the number of ops
zero, so the reply makes no sense.

Somewhat academic as this isn't a case any real client will hit, though
in theory perhaps that could change in a future protocol extension.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -1725,6 +1725,7 @@ nfsd4_proc_compound(struct svc_rqst *rqs
 	if (status) {
 		op = &args->ops[0];
 		op->status = status;
+		resp->opcnt = 1;
 		goto encode_op;
 	}