[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181002132506.076671947@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 06:25:34 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
stable@...nel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 80/94] ext4: never move the system.data xattr out of the inode body
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
commit 8cdb5240ec5928b20490a2bb34cb87e9a5f40226 upstream.
When expanding the extra isize space, we must never move the
system.data xattr out of the inode body. For performance reasons, it
doesn't make any sense, and the inline data implementation assumes
that system.data xattr is never in the external xattr block.
This addresses CVE-2018-10880
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200005
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
[groeck: Context changes]
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/xattr.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
@@ -1426,6 +1426,11 @@ static int ext4_xattr_make_inode_space(h
last = IFIRST(header);
/* Find the entry best suited to be pushed into EA block */
for (; !IS_LAST_ENTRY(last); last = EXT4_XATTR_NEXT(last)) {
+ /* never move system.data out of the inode */
+ if ((last->e_name_len == 4) &&
+ (last->e_name_index == EXT4_XATTR_INDEX_SYSTEM) &&
+ !memcmp(last->e_name, "data", 4))
+ continue;
total_size =
EXT4_XATTR_SIZE(le32_to_cpu(last->e_value_size)) +
EXT4_XATTR_LEN(last->e_name_len);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists