linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.18 059/228] s390/scm_blk: correct numa_node in scm_blk_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181002132503.265414638@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  2 Oct 2018 06:22:36 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 059/228] s390/scm_blk: correct numa_node in scm_blk_dev_setup

4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit d642d6262f4fcfa5d200ec6e218c17f0c15b3390 ]

The numa_node field of the tag_set struct has to be explicitly
initialized, otherwise it stays as 0, which is a valid numa node id and
cause memory allocation failure if node 0 is offline.

Acked-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/s390/block/scm_blk.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/drivers/s390/block/scm_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/block/scm_blk.c
@@ -455,6 +455,7 @@ int scm_blk_dev_setup(struct scm_blk_dev
 	bdev->tag_set.nr_hw_queues = nr_requests;
 	bdev->tag_set.queue_depth = nr_requests_per_io * nr_requests;
 	bdev->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
+	bdev->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
 
 	ret = blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(&bdev->tag_set);
 	if (ret)