| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 06:23:14 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel.opensrc@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 097/228] perf/hw_breakpoint: Split attribute parse and commit
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9a4903dde2c8633c5fcf887b98c4e047a6154a54 ]
arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings() mixes up attribute check and commit into
a single code entity. Therefore the validation may return an error due to
incorrect atributes while still leaving halfway modified architecture
breakpoint data.
This is harmless when we deal with a new breakpoint but it becomes a
problem when we modify an existing breakpoint.
Split attribute parse and commit to fix that. The architecture is
passed a "struct arch_hw_breakpoint" to fill on top of the new attr
and the core takes care about copying the backend data once it's fully
validated. The architectures then need to implement the new API.
Original-patch-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel.opensrc@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529981939-8231-2-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -400,16 +400,35 @@ int dbg_release_bp_slot(struct perf_even
return 0;
}
-static int validate_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
+#ifndef hw_breakpoint_arch_parse
+int hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(struct perf_event *bp,
+ const struct perf_event_attr *attr,
+ struct arch_hw_breakpoint *hw)
{
- int ret;
+ int err;
- ret = arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(bp);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ err = arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(bp);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ *hw = bp->hw.info;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static int hw_breakpoint_parse(struct perf_event *bp,
+ const struct perf_event_attr *attr,
+ struct arch_hw_breakpoint *hw)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(bp, attr, hw);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
if (arch_check_bp_in_kernelspace(bp)) {
- if (bp->attr.exclude_kernel)
+ if (attr->exclude_kernel)
return -EINVAL;
/*
* Don't let unprivileged users set a breakpoint in the trap
@@ -424,19 +443,22 @@ static int validate_hw_breakpoint(struct
int register_perf_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
{
- int ret;
+ struct arch_hw_breakpoint hw;
+ int err;
- ret = reserve_bp_slot(bp);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ret = validate_hw_breakpoint(bp);
+ err = reserve_bp_slot(bp);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
- /* if arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings() fails then release bp slot */
- if (ret)
+ err = hw_breakpoint_parse(bp, &bp->attr, &hw);
+ if (err) {
release_bp_slot(bp);
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ bp->hw.info = hw;
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
/**
@@ -464,6 +486,7 @@ modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(struct p
u64 old_len = bp->attr.bp_len;
int old_type = bp->attr.bp_type;
bool modify = attr->bp_type != old_type;
+ struct arch_hw_breakpoint hw;
int err = 0;
bp->attr.bp_addr = attr->bp_addr;
@@ -473,7 +496,7 @@ modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(struct p
if (check && memcmp(&bp->attr, attr, sizeof(*attr)))
return -EINVAL;
- err = validate_hw_breakpoint(bp);
+ err = hw_breakpoint_parse(bp, attr, &hw);
if (!err && modify)
err = modify_bp_slot(bp, old_type);
@@ -484,7 +507,9 @@ modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(struct p
return err;
}
+ bp->hw.info = hw;
bp->attr.disabled = attr->disabled;
+
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists