lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 15:50:32 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com> Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mingo@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com, chris.redpath@....com, patrick.bellasi@....com, valentin.schneider@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, thara.gopinath@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, tkjos@...gle.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, smuckle@...gle.com, adharmap@...eaurora.org, skannan@...eaurora.org, pkondeti@...eaurora.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, edubezval@...il.com, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, currojerez@...eup.net, javi.merino@...nel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/14] PM: Introduce an Energy Model management framework On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 01:54:17PM +0100, Quentin Perret wrote: > On Tuesday 02 Oct 2018 at 14:25:35 (+0200), Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Should we explicitly mention that this ignores idle costs? > > More doc shouldn't hurt so I can add a little something if you feel it's > needed. Yes please, every time I read that thing I wonder about idle energy. Then I remember we talked about this and it is expressly ignored.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists