[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87in2jo8u6.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:14:25 +0200
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, avagin@...tuozzo.com,
dima@...sta.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
0x7f454c46@...il.com, adrian@...as.de,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
gorcunov@...nvz.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, xemul@...tuozzo.com,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, criu@...nvz.org,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Setting monotonic time?
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Direct access to hardware/drivers and not through an abstraction like
>> the vfs (an abstraction over block devices) can legitimately be handled
>> by hotplug events. I unplug one keyboard I plug in another.
>>
>> I don't know if the input layer is more of a general abstraction
>> or more of a hardware device. I have not dug into it but my guess
>> is abstraction from what I have heard.
>>
>> The scary difficulty here is if after restart input is reporting times
>> in CLOCK_MONOTONIC and the applications in the namespace are talking
>> about times in CLOCK_MONOTONIC_SYNC. Then there is an issue. As even
>> with a fixed offset the times don't match up.
>>
>> So a time namespace absolutely needs to do is figure out how to deal
>> with all of the kernel interfaces reporting times and figure out how to
>> report them in the current time namespace.
>
> So you want to talk to Arnd who is leading the y2038 effort. He knowns how
> many and which interfaces are involved aside of the obvious core timer
> ones. It's quite an amount and the problem is that you really need to do
> that at the interface level, because many of those time stamps are taken in
> contexts which are completely oblivious of name spaces. Ditto for timeouts
> and similar things which are handed in through these interfaces.
Yep. That sounds right.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists