[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2308315.5DVx2N1Pa0@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 11:25:40 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] various dynamic_debug patches
On Thursday, September 20, 2018 10:05:00 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 20, 2018 12:04:22 AM CEST Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > This started as an experiment to see how hard it would be to change
> > the four pointers in struct _ddebug into relative offsets, a la
> > CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS, thus saving 16 bytes per
> > pr_debug site (and thus exactly making up for the extra space used by
> > the introduction of jump labels in 9049fc74). I stumbled on a few
> > things that are probably worth fixing regardless of whether the latter
> > half of this series is deemed worthwhile.
> >
> > Patch relationships: 1-2, 3-4, 5-6 and 15-16 can be applied
> > individually, though 2, 4 and 6 probably makes most sense in the
> > context of the final goal of the series.
>
> OK, I can take the [15-16/22] separately.
And they have been applied now.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists