[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tvm3id0f.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 12:40:48 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH 3/3] iwlwifi: Load firmware exclusively for Intel WiFi
Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> writes:
>> On Oct 3, 2018, at 5:10 PM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> writes:
>>
>>> To avoid the firmware loading race between Bluetooth and WiFi on Intel
>>> 8260, load firmware exclusively when BT_INTEL is enabled.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
>>
>> Still the commit log tells nothing about the actual problem which makes
>> review impossible.
>
> Sorry for that. The first two patches [1] only sends to linux-bluetooth and LMKL.
For a patchset like this you should CC linux-wireless for all patches,
otherwise people just get confused. And even more so as patch 3 seems to
depend on the other patches.
> I don’t know what really happened at hardware/firmware level, but
> making btusb and iwlwifi load firmware sequentially can workaround the
> issue.
We don't apply ugly workarounds without understanding the issue.
> Matt Chen may be able to explain this issue with more detail.
Then you need to work with Matt so that the issue is properly explained
in the commit log.
--
Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists