linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/hugetlb: Enable PUD level huge page migration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181003112758.GC4714@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 13:27:58 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        punit.agrawal@....com, will.deacon@....com, Steven.Price@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
        n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/hugetlb: Enable PUD level huge page migration

On Wed 03-10-18 12:17:52, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
[...]
> I have been under the idea that all the checks at the same level could
> have the same indentation. (i.e, 2 tabs in this case for each). Looks
> like there is no rule about it. How about replacing it with a
> switch..case  ?

I would simply follow the existing indentation style in that function.
Is this really worth discussig, anyway? Does the proposed change makes
the code harder to read?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs