lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 17:15:50 +0530
From:   Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vishwanath Somayaji <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Bad MAINTAINERS pattern in section 'INTEL PMC CORE DRIVER'

On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 03:10:58AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 11:00 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 12:54 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > > Please fix this defect appropriately.
> > > 
> > > linux-next MAINTAINERS section:
> > > 
> > >         7441    INTEL PMC CORE DRIVER
> > >         7442    M:      Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
> > >         7443    M:      Vishwanath Somayaji <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>
> > >         7444    L:      platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
> > >         7445    S:      Maintained
> > > -->     7446    F:      arch/x86/include/asm/pmc_core.h
> > >         7447    F:      drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core*
> > > 
> > > Commit that introduced this:
> > 
> > This is strange the shuffle of the MAINTAINERS based on the script is
> > a culprit of the above inconsistency.
> > 
> > Btw, I run parse-maintainers.pl against it and there are a lot more
> > "unsorted" lines.
> > What Linus or me or both did miss?
> 
> Nothing really.
> 
> The script used git-blame on the specific line, that's all.

Thanks for reporting this. I have sent the fix to the list.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/3/500.

> 
> There is no simple way to actually find a specific
> commit that adds a particular line to a file if there is
> any refactoring done to the file after it was added.
> 
> commit b740d2e9233cb33626d3b62210bcfc6a34baa839
> Author: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
> Date:   Thu May 26 14:41:19 2016 +0530
> 
>     platform/x86: Add PMC Driver for Intel Core SoC
> 
> Anyway, the real cause of the file pattern being unused
> was also written below:
> 
> > > Last commit with arch/x86/include/asm/pmc_core.h
> > > 
> > > commit 941691ef2197944a202d7870dcd7da3fb0391c65
> > > Author: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
> > > Date:   Wed Jan 31 11:50:22 2018 +0530
> > > 
> > >     platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Remove unused header file
> > > 
> > >     Recently sent patch 'platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Remove unused EXPORTED
> > >     API' missed to remove the header file 'arch/x86/include/asm/pmc_core.h'
> > >     which was solely used to declare the EXPORTED API
> > >     'intel_pmc_slp_s0_counter_read'. This patch provides the errata fix for the
> > >     same.
> > > 
> > >     Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
> > >     Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > >  arch/x86/include/asm/pmc_core.h       | 27 ---------------------------
> > >  drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c |  1 -
> > >  2 files changed, 28 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> > 
> 

-- 
Best Regards,
Rajneesh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ