[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181003114549.GA11877@raj-desk2.iind.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 17:15:50 +0530
From: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vishwanath Somayaji <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Bad MAINTAINERS pattern in section 'INTEL PMC CORE DRIVER'
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 03:10:58AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 11:00 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 12:54 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > > Please fix this defect appropriately.
> > >
> > > linux-next MAINTAINERS section:
> > >
> > > 7441 INTEL PMC CORE DRIVER
> > > 7442 M: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
> > > 7443 M: Vishwanath Somayaji <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>
> > > 7444 L: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
> > > 7445 S: Maintained
> > > --> 7446 F: arch/x86/include/asm/pmc_core.h
> > > 7447 F: drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core*
> > >
> > > Commit that introduced this:
> >
> > This is strange the shuffle of the MAINTAINERS based on the script is
> > a culprit of the above inconsistency.
> >
> > Btw, I run parse-maintainers.pl against it and there are a lot more
> > "unsorted" lines.
> > What Linus or me or both did miss?
>
> Nothing really.
>
> The script used git-blame on the specific line, that's all.
Thanks for reporting this. I have sent the fix to the list.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/3/500.
>
> There is no simple way to actually find a specific
> commit that adds a particular line to a file if there is
> any refactoring done to the file after it was added.
>
> commit b740d2e9233cb33626d3b62210bcfc6a34baa839
> Author: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
> Date: Thu May 26 14:41:19 2016 +0530
>
> platform/x86: Add PMC Driver for Intel Core SoC
>
> Anyway, the real cause of the file pattern being unused
> was also written below:
>
> > > Last commit with arch/x86/include/asm/pmc_core.h
> > >
> > > commit 941691ef2197944a202d7870dcd7da3fb0391c65
> > > Author: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
> > > Date: Wed Jan 31 11:50:22 2018 +0530
> > >
> > > platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Remove unused header file
> > >
> > > Recently sent patch 'platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Remove unused EXPORTED
> > > API' missed to remove the header file 'arch/x86/include/asm/pmc_core.h'
> > > which was solely used to declare the EXPORTED API
> > > 'intel_pmc_slp_s0_counter_read'. This patch provides the errata fix for the
> > > same.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/pmc_core.h | 27 ---------------------------
> > > drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c | 1 -
> > > 2 files changed, 28 deletions(-)
>
>
> >
>
--
Best Regards,
Rajneesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists