[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181003123328.GA29471@embeddedor.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 14:33:28 +0200
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] spi: slave: Fix missing break in switch
Apparently, this code does not actually fall through to the next case
because the machine restarts before it has a chance. However, for the
sake of maintenance and readability, we better add the missing break
statement.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1437892 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-slave-system-control.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-slave-system-control.c b/drivers/spi/spi-slave-system-control.c
index c0257e9..169f3d5 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-slave-system-control.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-slave-system-control.c
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static void spi_slave_system_control_complete(void *arg)
case CMD_REBOOT:
dev_info(&priv->spi->dev, "Rebooting system...\n");
kernel_restart(NULL);
+ break;
case CMD_POWEROFF:
dev_info(&priv->spi->dev, "Powering off system...\n");
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists