[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181003132155.GD7003@techsingularity.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 14:21:55 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jirka Hladky <jhladky@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, numa: Migrate pages to local nodes quicker early
in the lifetime of a task
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 06:37:41PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2018-10-02 23:00:05]:
>
> > I will try to get a DayTrader run in a day or two. There JVM and db threads
> > act on the same memory, I presume it might show some insights.
>
> I ran 2 runs of daytrader 7 with and without patch on a 2 node power9
> PowerNv box.
> https://github.com/WASdev/sample.daytrader7
> In each run, has 8 JVMs.
>
> Throughputs (Higher are better)
> Without patch 19216.8 18900.7 Average: 19058.75
> With patch 18644.5 18480.9 Average: 18562.70
>
> Difference being -2.6% regression
>
That's unfortunate.
How much does this workload normally vary between runs? If you monitor
migrations over time, is there an increase spike in migration early in
the lifetime of the workload?
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists