linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] usb: xhci: tegra: Add genpd support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 14:44:10 +0100
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] usb: xhci: tegra: Add genpd support


On 03/10/18 10:52, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>  static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>         struct tegra_xusb_mbox_msg msg;
>> @@ -1038,7 +1095,7 @@ static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>                 goto put_padctl;
>>         }
>>
>> -       if (!pdev->dev.pm_domain) {
>> +       if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "power-domains")) {
> 
> I am assuming the original check was because allowing the two
> power-domains to be (wrongly) modeled as one (or as a
> master+subdomain)?

Actually, the original check was added to prepare for supporting
multiple power-domains and that once we had proper support in place the
'pdev->dev.domain' would then be populated. However, given that this is
not used in the case of multiple power-domains, I simply changed the test.

> I was thinking that, perhaps we should add a new OF helper function,
> where one can get the number of specifiers being listed in the
> power-domains property. Would that help to easier distinguish what to
> do when dealing with backwards compatibility?

We could do, but it is not necessary here, because we never had any form
of genpd support for the Tegra xHCI driver.

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic