linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/16] scsi: Replace spin_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9c03e8e2-1fda-dd9e-2716-e45175111509@acm.org>
Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 06:53:19 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@...co.com>,
        Sesidhar Baddela <sebaddel@...co.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/16] scsi: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep

On 10/2/18 10:38 PM, Lance Roy wrote:
> lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
> since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
> also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>