[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181003162237.GH24030@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 18:22:37 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: john.hubbard@...il.com
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: introduce put_user_page(), placeholder version
On Thu 27-09-18 22:39:48, john.hubbard@...il.com wrote:
> From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
>
> Introduces put_user_page(), which simply calls put_page().
> This provides a way to update all get_user_pages*() callers,
> so that they call put_user_page(), instead of put_page().
>
> Also adds release_user_pages(), a drop-in replacement for
> release_pages(). This is intended to be easily grep-able,
> for later performance improvements, since release_user_pages
> is not batched like release_pages() is, and is significantly
> slower.
A small nit but can we maybe call this put_user_pages() for symmetry with
put_user_page()? I don't really care too much but it would look natural to
me.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists