linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ALSA: intel8x0: Fix fall-through annotations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 20:08:31 +0200
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: intel8x0: Fix fall-through annotations



On 10/3/18 6:19 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 18:08:07 +0200,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 12:38:36 +0200,
>>  Gustavo A. R. Silva  wrote:
>>>
>>> Replace "fallthru" with a proper "fall through" annotation.
>>>
>>> This fix is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
>>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>>
>> Thanks, applied.
> 
> BTW, does "fallthru" really cause a warning?  I thought it's also
> accepted as well as "fall-through".  At least, my gcc-8 doesn't give a
> warning with "fallthru".
> 

You are correct. It does not trigger a warning.

There are about 50 similar instances in the whole codebase. And, as they
are just a few, what I'm trying to do is to replace them with the most
commonly used form: "fall through"

Thanks
--
Gustavo