[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPybu_06=Mz+wGLeodM4CjP810Dphm9JKLmX62FVmspy0888ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 21:34:25 +0200
From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Zhouyang Jia <jiazhouyang09@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] mtd: maps: gpio-addr-flash: Add support for
device-tree devices
Hi Boris
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:01 PM Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:43:51 +0200
> Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > +static int gpio_flash_probe_gpios(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > + struct async_state *state)
> > +{
> > + struct physmap_flash_data *pdata;
> > + struct device_node *dn;
> > + struct resource *gpios = NULL;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + dn = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > + if (dn) {
> > + state->gpios = devm_gpiod_get_array(&pdev->dev, NULL,
> > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>
> Did you consider using gpiod_set_array_value() to update the gpio vals
> instead of having your own update loop (the for loop in the
> gf_set_gpios() func)?
Yes briefly but there are some cons:
- I need to allocate the value_array
- I want to relay on my cached old values, so I still have to loop
--
Ricardo Ribalda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists