linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: introduce put_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6178c173-ffbf-700b-f140-e4b184a5767e@nvidia.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:23:44 -0700
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, <john.hubbard@...il.com>
CC:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: introduce put_user_page(), placeholder version

On 10/3/18 9:22 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 27-09-18 22:39:48, john.hubbard@...il.com wrote:
>> From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
>>
>> Introduces put_user_page(), which simply calls put_page().
>> This provides a way to update all get_user_pages*() callers,
>> so that they call put_user_page(), instead of put_page().
>>
>> Also adds release_user_pages(), a drop-in replacement for
>> release_pages(). This is intended to be easily grep-able,
>> for later performance improvements, since release_user_pages
>> is not batched like release_pages() is, and is significantly
>> slower.
> 
> A small nit but can we maybe call this put_user_pages() for symmetry with
> put_user_page()? I don't really care too much but it would look natural to
> me.
> 

Sure. It started out as "make it a drop-in replacement for release_pages()",
but now it's not quite a drop-in replacement anymore. And in any case it's an 
opportunity to make the name more intuitive, so that seems like a good
idea.

If anyone hates put_user_pages() and wants to campaign relentlessly for
release_pages*(), then now is the time! :)


thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA