[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbHD4fNq0jz_JBuake7piJwRJmiK_JtsMXkiWVWxnis8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:21:11 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: bgurney@...hat.com
Cc: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>, Damien.LeMoal@....com,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, aherrmann@...e.com, mgorman@...e.com,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com, oleksandr@...alenko.name,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: BFQ default for single queue devices
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:34 PM Bryan Gurney <bgurney@...hat.com> wrote:
> Right now, users of host-managed SMR drives should be using "deadline"
> or "mq-deadline", to avoid out-of-order writes in sequential-only
> zones.
>
> I'm running into a situation right now on a test system (Fedora 28,
> 4.18.7 kernel) where I copied test data onto an F2FS filesystem, but I
> accidentally forgot to add my "udev rule" file:
This should be fixed after
d5038a13eca7 scsi: core: switch to scsi-mq by default
right?
Since mq use mq-deadline by default.
I'm making sure to preserve mq-deadline on zoned devices
in my v2 of this patch.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists