linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drivers: s390: Avoids building drivers if ARCH is not s390.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADvQ+rHDB390FWW5cPrmJqDobkv-R2K1B7-potVtTLp0RfUS-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 22:00:49 -0300
From:   Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@...il.com>
To:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:     lkcamp@...ts.libreplanetbr.org,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
        Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drivers: s390: Avoids building drivers if ARCH is
 not s390.

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:46 AM Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:08:14PM -0300, Leonardo Brás wrote:
> > Avoids building s390 drivers if 'make drivers/s390/' is called but
> > ARCH is not s390.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Brás <leobras.c@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/s390/Makefile | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/s390/Makefile b/drivers/s390/Makefile
> > index a863b0462b43..0575f02dba45 100644
> > --- a/drivers/s390/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/s390/Makefile
> > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> >  # Makefile for the S/390 specific device drivers
> >  #
> >
> > -obj-y += cio/ block/ char/ crypto/ net/ scsi/ virtio/
> > -
> > -drivers-y += drivers/s390/built-in.a
> > -
> > +ifeq ($(ARCH),s390)
> > +     obj-y += cio/ block/ char/ crypto/ net/ scsi/ virtio/
> > +     drivers-y += drivers/s390/built-in.a
> > +endif
>
> And then somebody wants to build with e.g. "make drivers/s390/cio/" and it
> still doesn't work. So _if_ this should be supported then it should work
> with all directory levels and all configuration options. Otherwise this is
> going to be a never ending story.
>


It makes sense.
I proposed this change to help me solving a problem described here
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/3/707), and for this it was enough if it didn't
build when "make drivers/s390/" was called.

Sorry I didn't send the e-mail with the reason earlier.

For solving my problem it was not necessary, but if you think it's interesting,
I could refactor all drivers/s390 Makefiles to make them all build only if
we are dealing with the s390 architecture.

What do you think?

Thanks for the reply,

Leonardo Bras