[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181004091651.GB21151@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:16:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: hpa@...or.com
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/10] x86: refcount: prevent gcc distortions
* hpa@...or.com <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Ingo: I wasn't talking necessarily about the specifics of each bit, but rather the general
> concept about being able to use macros in inlines...
Ok, agreed about that part - and some of the patches did improve readability.
Also, the 275 lines macros.s is a lot nicer than the 4,200 lines macros.S.
Also, I'm not against using workarounds when the benefits are larger than the costs, but I am
against *hiding* the fact that these are workarounds and that for some of them there are costs.
> I can send you something I have been working on in the background, but have been holding off
> on because of this, in the morning my time.
BTW., I have applied most of the series to tip:x86/kbuild already, and will push them out later
today after some testing. I didn't apply the final 3 patches as they have dependencies, but
applied the basics and fixed up the changelogs.
So you can rely on this.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists