[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181004095701.j5zt5guetxswdbi7@queper01-lin>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:57:04 +0100
From: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mingo@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, chris.redpath@....com,
patrick.bellasi@....com, valentin.schneider@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, thara.gopinath@...aro.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, tkjos@...gle.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
smuckle@...gle.com, adharmap@...eaurora.org,
skannan@...eaurora.org, pkondeti@...eaurora.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, edubezval@...il.com,
srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, currojerez@...eup.net,
javi.merino@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/14] sched: Introduce a sched_feat for Energy Aware
Scheduling
On Wednesday 03 Oct 2018 at 18:24:35 (+0200), Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Yeah, sysctl, see for example: sysctl.kernel.numa_balancing and the
> sched_numa_balancing static_key that goes with it.
OK, that works for me.
> I would default enable EAS if the EM is there and valid, but allow
> people to disable it.
Right, that'd be much nicer than the sched_feat off by default, I
agree. I'll see what I can do :-)
Thanks,
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists