linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] clk: qcom: Add lpass clock controller driver for SDM845

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <66fc65d8-92ec-f32c-6edb-ad4952695395@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:31:27 +0530
From:   Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] clk: qcom: Add lpass clock controller driver for
 SDM845


On 9/29/2018 12:21 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-09-18 03:25:38)
>> @@ -3469,6 +3495,8 @@ enum {
>>          [GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK_SRC] = &gcc_qspi_core_clk_src.clkr,
>>          [GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK] = &gcc_qspi_core_clk.clkr,
>>          [GCC_QSPI_CNOC_PERIPH_AHB_CLK] = &gcc_qspi_cnoc_periph_ahb_clk.clkr,
>> +       [GCC_LPASS_Q6_AXI_CLK] = NULL,
>> +       [GCC_LPASS_SWAY_CLK] = NULL,
>>   };
>>   
>>   static const struct qcom_reset_map gcc_sdm845_resets[] = {
>> @@ -3583,6 +3611,13 @@ static int gcc_sdm845_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>          if (ret)
>>                  return ret;
>>   
>> +       if (of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,lpass-protected")) {
> 
> Shouldn't this be negated? So that we only add the clks when lpass isn't
> protected?
>

I was of the opinion to add the flag only when LPASS clocks are 
required. But I am fine negating it too.

>> +               gcc_sdm845_clocks[GCC_LPASS_Q6_AXI_CLK] =
>> +                       &gcc_lpass_q6_axi_clk.clkr;
>> +               gcc_sdm845_clocks[GCC_LPASS_SWAY_CLK] =
>> +                       &gcc_lpass_sway_clk.clkr;
>> +       }
>> +
>>          return qcom_cc_really_probe(pdev, &gcc_sdm845_desc, regmap);

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--