[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181004130701.GA4539@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:07:01 +0200
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] rtc: m41t80: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "Fall" with a proper
"Fall through" comment.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373875 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Change subject and commit log.
drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
index ad03e2f..a3fb235 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static int wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
return -EINVAL;
wdt_margin = new_margin;
wdt_ping();
- /* Fall */
+ /* Fall through */
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
return put_user(wdt_margin, (int __user *)arg);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists