[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKkCL7YVajp0b5x7G=06XyrhLrvh_p8FAKNKKYZW7sAfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 09:02:50 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
"Schaufler, Casey" <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH security-next v4 23/32] selinux: Remove boot parameter
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 10:38 PM, John Johansen
<john.johansen@...onical.com> wrote:
> but distinct of first exclusive (major) will likely be going away
> once full lsm stacking land.
Right -- then policy loading because the "enabled" flag. The point is
to get us to where we don't care about exclusivity at all.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists