linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] cpuidle: menu: Get rid of first_idx from menu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0h1Z7MKjq9XY0-tn9U4J3CdycYPbGkM3fjH7-FzaJ=uJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Oct 2018 19:19:41 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] cpuidle: menu: Get rid of first_idx from menu_select()

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 4:51 PM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:44:06PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > Rearrange the code in menu_select() so that the loop over idle states
> > always starts from 0 and get rid of the first_idx variable.
> >
> > While at it, add two empty lines to separate conditional statements
> > one another.
> >
> > No intentional behavior changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > ---
>
> This code is becoming a bit complex to follow :/
>
> May be I missed something, but it is not possible to enter the condition without
> idx != 0, no ? (I meant the condition if ((drv->states[idx].flags &
> FLAG_POLLING))

Not sure what you mean.

We start with idx = -1, i = 0.  If state[0] is enabled, idx becomes 0.

If the target residency or exit latency of state[0] are already beyond
the limits, we just bail out and state[0] will be returned.

If not, we go to i = 1, but idx is still 0.  If the target residency
of state[1] is beyond predicted_us (which is the interesting case), we
check (drv->states[0].flags & FLAG_POLLING) and so on.

Currently, the polling state must be state[0] (if used at all) anyway.

> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>

Thanks!